Mistake-Proofing (Poka-Yoke)
The goal isn't to find errors faster. It's to make errors impossible. Poka-yoke is how. Analyzes every error opportunity in a process and generates solutions ranked from strongest (elimination) to weakest (procedure).
Problems This Solves
Three signs a process is relying on the wrong controls
The Hierarchy
Five levels, strongest to weakest
The hierarchy forces a discipline: before you reach for a sensor or an inspection step, prove you've considered whether the step can be eliminated or made physically impossible to get wrong. These five levels are this toolkit's own ranking, not a Shingo standard. Shigeo Shingo, who developed poka-yoke within the Toyota Production System, sorted devices into control types that stop the process and warning types that signal a problem, and by method: contact, fixed-value or motion-step.
Human-dependent controls like training, checklists, and reminders sit at Level 5, the weakest rung, because they depend on every person being correct every time. The skill will generate human-dependent solutions when nothing else is feasible, but it labels them explicitly as the weakest level and asks whether a stronger solution exists.
Error Type Taxonomy
Six types of errors, six solution directions
Before generating solutions, the skill classifies each error opportunity by type. Different error types require different poka-yoke approaches. An omission and a quantity error need completely different solutions even when they occur in the same process step.
Solution Examples
Concrete solutions for each error type
The skill maps each error type to a set of known poka-yoke starting points, then ranks the solutions by hierarchy level and feasibility for the specific process.
Examples
Manufacturing and clinical applications
Circuit board assembly: 3 error opportunities identified (wrong component, missing component, wrong quantity of solder paste). Ranked solutions generated for each: keyed feeder slots for the wrong component, a pre-measured dispenser for the paste quantity, and a vision check after placement for the missing component.
Process: PCB Assembly — Component Placement
Error opportunities identified: 3
Error types: Wrong item · Omission · Quantity error
Solution ranking:
1. Keyed feeder slots so only the right reel fits (Level 2, prevention)
2. Pre-measured solder paste dispenser (Level 2, prevention)
3. Vision system check after placement (Level 3, detection)
[NEEDS GEMBA: confirm the existing feeders can take a keying feature]
Medication administration in a hospital unit. The skill adapts vocabulary to clinical context: "operator" becomes "nurse," "part" becomes "medication." Unit-dose packaging and barcode verification at the bedside map to Levels 2 and 3. Tall-man lettering is a visual alert that depends on a person noticing it, so it sits at Level 5.
The right-patient, right-drug, right-dose checks are Level 3 (detection) controls at best when implemented as manual verification. The skill flags opportunities to move toward Level 2–3: barcode scanning with forced workflow, unit-dose packaging, and smart pump libraries that block out-of-range entries.
What you get
A real run on the sample data
Unedited output. The sample message at the top went to Claude Sonnet 4.6 (an earlier-generation model, so a newer one may word things differently) with this skill pasted in, the same way the steps below show, on September 29, 2026. Scroll inside the frame to read the whole reply.
Installation
Describe the process. Get the solutions.
resources/examples folder.Related Skills